On October 25th, the Honors Program Exchange had their second meeting. Students were asked to come prepared by watching “Examined Life,” a video documenting the challenges of navigating public spaces narrated by the discussion of Judith Butler and Sunaura Taylor, academics in gender studies and disability studies, respectively. Together, they highlighted how physical environments impose many challenges for people with disabilities, and how social acceptability begins when physical spaces become more inclusive. One of the most memorable pieces of their discussion was how society expects us to be radically self-sufficient. This made me think about the isolation many of us experience in larger cities, where we are expected to act in a fast-paced environment.  

 This video was essential in setting up the question of what it means to take a walk, which we were tasked with doing by reflecting on a space on Roosevelt’s campus. I chose to focus on the Auditorium 5th floor women’s bathroom. This bathroom has a lounge area with couches, presenting a very unique experience of the space. This bathroom also has different elevations with a built-in ramp in the floor. I reflected on the video, specifically on the concept of social acceptability relating to disability. Although I usually move through this space quickly, it was an interesting thought exercise to be more intentional with my interactions and consider space and accessibility differently.  

During our session, we shared our insights about the places we chose. From the Wabash laundry room to the awkward corners in the Auditorium building, each space revealed something worth discussing. We also spoke on how physical design changes over time. Roosevelt provides two distinct environments between both buildings, showing interesting design choices. Because the Auditorium Building is a National Historical Landmark, there are restrictions on changes that can be made. However, throughout time, the function of the building has changed, so the design has adapted. I reflected on how space dictates movement, and how some spaces can invite us to stay, while others prompt us to keep moving. Throughout all our contributions, we used the video previously mentioned to reflect on the accessibility of spaces.  

Students sharing the spaces they chose.

After our thought-provoking discussion, we learned about the seven rules of universal design. It addresses the need of building independence while also instilling a sense of community and care. I found it interesting how small changes, like adding texture and bolder colors, can be aesthetically pleasing while equally functional for all people. It made me wonder how Roosevelt could implement these features as well. One key aspect of universal design that also resonated with me is that there is not always true universality, and how some key changes can disrupt the needs of others. I feel like it highlights the complexity of accessibility through its differing and conflicting needs. Instead of turning away from this, designers lean into the discomfort to continue to adapt.  

Throughout this meeting, I enjoyed listening to the insightful comments from my peers. Our discussion was helpful in tackling the complexity of accessibility and physical spaces. There is no true and entirely effective approach. This highlights the need for diverse disciplines to collaborate and work together. Furthermore, our discussions underscored how accessibility and design is a social justice issue. It makes me wonder how Roosevelt can be more inclusive and intentional, as a social justice institution.